Wednesday, 22 July 2009

Armenia vs Azerbaijan: visa policy


View on the Georgian-Armenian border from Georgia's side

Georgian-Armenian border, 13:05, 20 July, 2009

It is now more than 1,5 hours we are standing in a line on the Georgian-Armenian border, Sadakhlo check-point. The line is not moving, and we – passengers – even started to think that the border guards are having a lunch time or maybe even a day off. It is hot. The driver put on Russian pop music, and I even managed to recognize one Azeri ‘chanson’ music performed in Russian. Bearing in mind the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, it is rather weird to hear this song on the border. The last time I crossed this part of the border two years ago, when Georgian border check-point was just a one shack. Now it is a two-story building with a modern equipment and infrastructure.

Besides Armenians, who are going back home, I travel with one Slovenian and three Polish tourists, who first arrived to Georgia, travelled there and then decided to go to Armenia, because it is rather easy to obtain a visa on the border. After the August war last year there are not so many tourists coming to Georgia, mainly people from Eastern Europe and the US, the majority of whom are young people, students. It is interesting to note here that these young people after visiting Georgia chose Armenia not Azerbaijan. The reason of this choice is rather simple – in order to enter Azerbaijan, you should get a tourist visa or have an invitation from your friend, Azerbaijani citizen. After my visit to the consular section of the Embassy of Azerbaijan in Tbilisi, I was told that in order to get a visa, I should have an invitation. Asked, whether it is possible to obtain a tourist visa via travel agency, the man with whom I had spoken, alluded that in that case the procedure of obtaining visa will be more difficult and longer. Therefore I decided first to visit Armenia and then go to Azerbaijan, when I get an invitation from my friend.

It is not a secret that tourists get two different narratives about Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, when visiting Azerbaijan and Armenia. Therefore more foreign tourists visit your country, more people hear your ‘narrative’ and side with you. Among them might be young scholars, future diplomats and opinion makers. The trend I observer now is that more tourists visit Armenia, when they arrive to Georgia. And as I have mentioned previously, the reason is the visa policy. Young people do not want to pay 60 EUR per visa or wait for an invitation to enter Azerbaijan.

I have just asked a Slovenian guy, whether he has plans to visit Azerbaijan. He’s saying that it is too expensive for him. He has no friends there to send him an invitation, but the travel agency in Tbilisi asked for additional 75 EUR to make all the necessary arrangements for the visa. Adding 60 EUR for the visa, a tourist had to pay 135 EUR in total just to enter the country and wait for 5-10 days. Meanwhile, Armenian visa for 21 days during the tourist season costs only 10 USD or 7 EUR and you can get it easily on the border, even if you are a tourist-backpacker, who did not book any hotel beforehand.

***
Yerevan, 22 July, 2009

I have just got a letter from my friend with a copy of the invitation, which has been sent to the Azerbaijani embassy in Riga, not Tbilisi. In the letter case it would have taken them more days to make an invitation. I do hope that the consul will understand the complexity of the situation and issue me a visa, so I can travel to Azerbaijan.

PS: I really cannot understand why it is so difficult to enter Azerbaijan, don't they need the money I am going to spend there thus boosting regional business, don't they need more internantional support for their narrative about Nagorno-Karabakh? Should I make a conclusion that Azerbaijan is not a tourist-friendly country? So many questions in my head...

Friday, 3 July 2009

Voice of the young generation: They don't really care about us!

I have just watched a video of Michael Jackson, making his last rehearsal before the death and performing one of his famous songs - "They do not care about us". It was just two minuted after I read in the news that in a time of a deep financial crisis in Latvia, when a country is on a verge of bunkrupcy, a newly elected Chairman of Jelgava region Ziedonis Cauna will receive a salary of 1950 LVL (2775 EUR) per month, even more than Latvian Prime Minister and just around 350 EUR less that the president of Latvia!! His deputies will receive more that members of the Cabinet of Ministers. Meanwhile, pensions have been cut for 10%-20% and 70% for the pensioners who work in order to survive! The salaries have been cut for all state employees - teachers (who will soon receive a bit more that a minimum wage), policemen (professionals are leaving, trying to find a well-paid job in other European countries, primarly in Scandinavian countries, the UK, Ireland, Germany), doctors (young professionals search for opportunities to find a proper work aborad) and other state employees.

But it seems the wages are on the rise for the heads of the local and regional municipalities... However, nobody will surpass a rector of the state-funded Riga Stradins University, Jānis Gardovskis, who earns more than 11 000 LVL (15 600 EUR) per month. In his defence, he's saying that he earns so much, because the university managed to attract money from other funds. Meanwhile, this February the university administration doubled the price for the student dormiteries, forcing them to pay 70 EUR instead of 35 EUR...

I feel that those on top really DO NOT CARE ABOUT US, the young generation of Latvia....

This case with the newly elected civil servants, whose one of the first decisions was to raise their salaries, is a signal that this self-enrichment using tax payers money might be a never-ending story....

Frustrated...

PS:

Monday, 2 March 2009

Some thoughts about Azerbaijan...

Baku, July 208
July 25, 2008

My plane has recently landed in Riga airport from Baku, two weeks long journey is over and I am trying to collect my written notes and organize my impressions, thoughts about the time I spent in Azerbaijan, people I met, stories I heard. I beg your pardon in advance if you find some of my notes critical or not objective as you understand them. But these are the notes of one Latvian idealist.

The first thing which flashed into my mind when I got off the plane in Riga airport was about fresh air. “Wow, amazingly fresh air! I can breath!” – I told myself that time, thinking later that the air in the airport might be one of the most polluted in Riga, but it is even more polluted in Baku and Apsheron peninsula at large, where polluted air, dust, car emissions and hot weather during summer days create an environment difficult to endure for a person who did not get used to such conditions. Numerous reports on the world’s dirties cities found in the internet name Sumqayit – city close to Baku – as the one of the most polluted areas on the Earth, but some locals told me that it might happen that soon Baku will replace Sumqayit on the list, as most of the Soviet-era old chemical plants are closed or functioning at low capacity.

Lifting crane has already become a visible symbol of Baku. Construction works are everywhere, which symbolizes the economical boom country experience these days as oil and gas money fills the pockets of the government and better off citizens. Although it seems to me that a proper city development strategy plan has not yet been agreed on and discussed with the public. Usually public is just informed, not consulted. Only few people I met told me that they really like the city where do they live. Maybe this is just a minor fact to mention, but it reveals us a lot about the relations between authorities and society at large, but I will get back to this discussion later.

Let me describe my last day in Baku, when I decided to attend a workshop of my Finnish friend for the IDP children, living in a separate zone in one of the districts of Baku. It was terribly hot that day. The workshop started at 1 pm, but it seemed that children were waiting for it to start long before as the cheerful crowd of children age 7-12 greeted us in front of the building. We got the key and entered a tiny room with a small window, three tables, several chairs and a flipchart. In a few minutes one more volunteer from France and a local girl-interpreter showed up. The theme of the day was volunteerism and volunteer work. Children were asked to share their views on numerous topics related to volunteerism, also being engaged in some interactive games. And I was really amazed by the patience of children, who had to spend several hours in a tiny stuffy room. They were noisy as usually children are, but some of their thoughts gave me a lot of food for thinking.

Once they were asked to share their views on what they like and dislike in Azerbaijan. Music, national instruments, food, historical monuments, Baku old town and many other things were mentioned as the things children like most of all. Poor living conditions (housing), littering, pollution were mentioned as the most negative things about Azerbaijan. “How you can solve these problems?” my Finnish friend asked a boy. “We can write a joint appeal to the President, and he will definitely help us”, the boy answered. His view was shared by others. Asking, how we can all solve the problem of littering, most of the children replied that their parents litter, throw plastic bottles outside, thus showing an example for them.

We took a small break for cookies and a glass of water. My friend and I went out to breathe some fresh air, discussing what has been said by the children. Somehow I could not understand why people living in such bad conditions all the time complain, hope for the president and do nothing to change their environment, making it even worse. I heard about it from old people, but was amazed to hear the same from children. Why not to take your own initiative, clear the courtyard and paint entrances of the houses with the help of children to make your environment friendly and more creative? Is it just because of the mentality to count just on the authorities or apathy to do smth and go with the flow? One can point that this is the job of the local authorities and people should demand more, especially if you live in oil rich country, but petro dollars or manats do not reach ordinary people. Moreover, most of the people still have this Soviet mentality of the authorities as not just civil servants who are elected to serve the people and their needs, but powerful people who are empowered to rule over them. But as regards ecological situation in the country, I think ecological problems will pursue Azerbaijan in the future and the situation even might get even worse, one argument for that – children are shown an example that littering is not a bad thing and not taught to cherish the nature and environment where do they live.

Azerbaijan can be an example for the region, introducing alternative sources of energy – wind and solar – and not basing their economy only on oil and gas as the basic source of energy. Baku is known as the city of wind, but sun is shining in most of the time, especially during spring, summer and fall. But you will never see a windmill or solar batteries on the roof of a house in Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan has a huge potential to be a leader in this sphere, producing not only oil and gas vital for the European economy, but also clean energy and equipment to get this energy. Some people with whom I had a chance to talk see the future of Azerbaijan in the development of IT sphere, so the country can produce leading IT specialist and even can compete with India for the outsourcing of the Western business. How long it will take to Azerbaijan to transform and educate its society? I was told that it might be a strategy for 2025, while, for example, rivalry Armenia has already begun to position itself as a land of outsourcing – IT, accounting etc. Some colleagues of mine during our discussion on this topic pointed that the future of Azerbaijan might be the development and focusing more on nanotechnology. It might be so, but this means more investment in education and applied sciences. Investments are vitally needed also into the infrastructure, especially roads! I can just mention that it took us 5,5 hours to drive 160 km from Baku to northern city of Quba located in the Northern part of the country. The main road was in a terrible condition.

However, in order to make Azerbaijan a prosperous country reforms are crucially needed – less bureaucracy, one window policy for local business and foreign investors, establishment of the independent anti-corruption bureau etc. But it is impossible to do this without the will of the elite, which is now so enriched and consist only from better off people, who live in a completely different world full of luxury. And it is not surprisingly that children of this elite class of citizens who gained their fortune are vivid supporters of the policy of Heydar Aliyev and his son and successor Ilham Aliyev, some of them joining the pro-presidential movement “Ireli” (azer, “forward”). They might be just 22, having already a cool car, expensive clothes and prestigious job, because they have rich parents with so needed and crucial network of friends and relatives, who hold good position in the government or state controlled institutions. And these people are diplomats and high-ranking officials in the foreseeable future. I cannot argue that this is the common trend, but this is the impression I got after my two visits to the country.

“We do not need your democracy!”, “Do not teach us how to live!”, “If not Heydar Aliyev we might not be an independent country, this is all thanks to him!”, “We have already seen your style of democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan!” – these are the words taken from my discussion with young fortunate Azerbaijanis working for state institutions and studying in prestigious universities.

Absence of the rule of law, endemic corruption, cronyism, wealth gap, lack of transparency, widespread poverty – these are the things young Azerbaijanis living in the IDP neighbourhood of Baku wrote in their papers, describing what do they dislike in Azerbaijan. The section “what I like” was empty or full of question marks. This is the case I was told by my friend, who conducted several workshops for different age IDPs from Nagrno-Karabakh. These young men have no money and have no hope for the better future, because the style of governance is not created for and does not benefit them. Some of these young people join various democratic youth movements, but some are searching for the opportunity to go to Europe or the USA with the aim to stay there, citing that they can help their country more while living abroad.

Here I might be accused of having too critical approach, not mentioning positive sides of the work of the government, but I just reflect an impression of a Latvian idealist. I really cannot understand the meaning of the Day of National Salvation (June 15), when Heydar Aliyev came to power once again in 1993, celebrations of the 39th anniversary when Heydar Aliyev came to power in 1969 on July 14, oil rich country with hospitals in Baku and regions resembling mad houses from horror movies. Maybe the answer is that I have been socialized in a completely different way – to think critically, be active and responsible citizen, to have a debate within the society, to ask maximum and strive for it – and I have completely different values in my life.

Leaders of Muslim and mountainous Jews, whom I met during my trip, started and finished their speeches, praising the current leadership of the country, but why I see so many negative sides? I do not claim that Latvia is perfect in everything – democratic establishment of the country, governance style, economics, but I see this debate, openness of the governance system, check & balances. What I see in Azerbaijan is a cult of personality, where people have no freedom to choose, but just to respect and obey.


PS: On July 11, it took us 4 hours to get from Qobustan to Baki (around 40 km) or maybe even more as were were stuck in the worst traffic jam I have ever experienced. The reason: opening of the mosque down on the route, where president I. Aliyev took part. There were no announcement before that day that the road will be closed for a certain period of time. Moreover, there were just 2-3 cars of the traffic police, trying to manage the flow of cars, but unsuccessfully. As a result we had to get off and continue our roure by foot.


Sunday, 1 March 2009

AZERBAIJAN – “SWIMMING IN THE EMPTY POOL?”

Extract from an published paper on the Democratization trends in the South Caucasus through the prism of the presidential elections in 2008:


Chapter II: Azerbaijan - "Swimming in the Empty Pool?"

On December 16, 2008 the ruling “New Azerbaijan Party” (YAP), whose Chairman is the current president of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, sounded its proposal to scrap the limit on the presidential term, arguing that “the fact is that presidency of one person more than twice is a breach of law. This version cannot give chance to electors to state their position”. According to the Deputy Chairman of YAP, Executive Secretary of the Party Ali Ahmadov if the condition was not established for a person, who people wanted to elect, they would be obliged to vote for unwished person.

Supporters of this move like to make references to the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt who served four consequent presidential terms. However, their opponents, like Ali Kerimli, accuse authorities in attempt to “legalize monarchy” and follow the example of George Washington as ” Presidential term limits were created to prevent politicians from clinging to power and to place system-based procedure above personality-driven politics. But it seems the impulse of many world leaders to view themselves as indispensable remains strong. Azerbaijan is just the latest in a long line of countries”. In a recent article, which sparked controversy in Azerbaijan, Armenian political analyst David Babayan describes the curent trends in Azerbaijan as the “smooth transition into the Azerbaijani khanate”, which used to be a form of rule in Azerbaijan till 19th century, when the region become a part of the Russian empire.

Indeed, former president of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev has been proclaimed as a national leader. The day he returned from Nakhchivan to Baku in 1993 to rule the country (June 15) is an official holiday called National Salvation Day, his birthday on May 10 is celebrated as Flower Festival, July 14 is celebrated as the day when Heydar Aliyev was elected as the First Secretary of the Central Committee of Azerbaijan Communist Party in 1969. Ilham Aliyev “inharited” presidency from his father Heydar Aliyev in elections on October 15 2003, which were marked as rigged both by international observers and opposition, causing massive protest rallies, which were dispersed by police with five protestors being killed. Parliamentarian elections on November 6, 2005 were also marked by fraud and violence.

Since then there has been no dialogue between government and opposition, despite the several attempts and mediation efforts from the side of international community, including OSCE, which has proposed several important amendments to the Election Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan like configuring of the Central Election Commission and lower-level commissions to ensure they enjoy public confidence, in particular the trust of those running for office as previously they were controlled by the ruling New Azerbaijan Party. On June 2, 2008 the Parliament of Azerbaijan has adopted new amendments to the Election Code without addressing this issue, which was “one area of concern” of the OSCE Venice Commission. Another “areas of concern” was reduction of the official election campaign (media and voter agitation period) by 50% from 60 days to 28 and removal of the legal obligation of State-funded AzTV to provide equal campaign conditions and prohibited it from conducting any form of campaign.

Television in Azerbaijan remains the most important news disseminator and that is controlled, either by the owners who have allegiance to the establishment or by local authorities, but state-funded AzTV covering almost the entire country. According to the leader of the opposition Musavat Party Isa Gambar, “restrictions on access to TV mean that authorities, who are conducting their propaganda 24 hours a day during the whole year, are afraid that the opposition would have a few hours for contact with voters.”

All major opposition parties condemned the amendments and decided to boycott the presidential elections to be held on October 15, 2008, citing “continued persecution of the opposition, a lack of normal and free conditions for holding an election and restrictions on campaigning.” As a result of this decision, these elections resembled more like a “referendum” on trust to the incumbent president Ilham Aliyev as he faced no real competitors as some of them (like leader of Muasir Musavat Party Hafiz Hajiyev, who in his campaign criticised more the “entourage” of the president, but not himself) even had portraits of the incumbent president and their competitor Ilham Aliyev.



OSCE International Election Observation Mission in its preliminary statement assesses the elections “with their compliance with OSCE and Council of Europe commitments and standards for democratic elections”, however pointing in its preliminary conclusions that “elections marked considerable progress toward meeting OSCE and Council of Europe commitments and other international standards but did not meet all commitments.” However, there are several important facts on the election process to be mentioned (according to the IEOM Report, October 16, 2008):
  • On October 3, 2008 according to the stipulation of the Law on Freedom of Assembly Azerbaijan’s Cabinet of Ministers approved list of places prohibited for mass actions, which consists only from administrative buildings occupied by the central, regional and city executive powers. Moreover, the Law states that “The number of picketers shall not be more than 50 persons and they shall not be located closer than 10 meters to the entrance of a picketed object, shall not make obstacles for entry and exit into the picketed object and shall not use amplifiers above 10 watt;”
  • While the law states that the relevant executive bodies shall provide special venues for conducting rallies and shall issue a list of “proposed places” from which the organizers of such rallies “can choose”. The Baku City authorities interpreted it as an exclusive list and denied requests of the opposition group “Joint Front of Democratic Forces” to hold rallies in the centre of the city in places which were not included in the list drawn up by the authorities;
  • The election process was carried out in a peaceful manner, but was characterized by a lack of robust competition and of vibrant political discourse facilitated by media, and thus did not reflect all the principles of a meaningful and pluralistic democratic elections;
  • Election commissions were appointed under a politically contentious formula;
  • The incumbent president faced a field of candidates who commanded little apparent public support. Most of the public was not aware of any campaigning by other candidates nor seemed aware that any candidate aside from Ilham Aliyev was running;
  • Although the incumbent president declared his intention not to campaign personally, he extensively toured the country in his official capacity, inaugurating new factories, roads, schools, sport complexes, museums and an airport, visiting military installations but also awarding flats to veterans. These visits, which received wide media coverage, were associated with campaign activities by the media and the electorate. This blurring of the distinction between the regular activities of the incumbent and his campaign created unequal campaigning opportunities;
  • People had been obliged to attend rallies organised by the YAP. In some cases law-enforcement bodies and organizers prevented participants from leaving rallies at their convenience;
  • There was limited coverage of the campaign in the news programme and most of the broadcasters (state-funded and private) with national outreach devoted the bulk of their news coverage to the incumbent president;
  • As opposition called people to boycott the elections thus trying to achieve low voter turnout, which will mean lack of legitimacy for Ilham Aliyev, authorities organised special schemes of brining people to the polling stations (“pyramidal networks of persons responsible for the group of voters organised by local authorities and/or election commissions, and were in some cases linked to the YAP”).

According to the CEC results, Ilham Aliyev got 87, 34% of votes with 75, 64% voter turnout with all the candidates conceding their defeat. While ruling party (YAP) stated that this election was “a triumph of democracy”, Iranian election monitors did not notice any violations, GUAM Secretary General Valeri Chechelashvili stated that presidential elections were democratic, CIS Observation Mission was of the same opinion (“the elections were legitimate, open and transparent”), but head of the mission Mikhail Krotov stated that Azerbaijan can even teach democracy to other countries and offered to hold an international workshop in Baku for learning Azerbaijani election experience.

Statements of European observers were also mainly positive about the election process:

  • “Elections in Azerbaijan are like the elections in all European countries” (Solomon Passy, former OSCE Chairman, former Bulgarian Foreign Minister and candidate for the NATO Secretary general);
  • “Elections meeting international norms were held in Azerbaijan and European Parliament observers have not recorded any breach of law” (Kristina Ojuland, Vice Speaker of the Parliament of Estonia)

Only Andres Herkel, the head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary delegation, said openly that the election was "a very good swimming exercise, but unfortunately, it's an empty pool." Indeed, despite the technically smoothly conducted elections, the election process is not only about Election Day, but is the whole process, including election campaign and appropriate legislation to conduct free and fair elections, which was not the case in Azerbaijan.

[...]

PS (!):

The Briefing: Postmortem Of The Azerbaijani Election

RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service Director Kenan Aliyev discusses this week's presidential election in Azerbaijan, which he characterized as rigged and without any meaningful opposition.

PHOTOS: Courtesy of Marcin Lapczyncki